Friday, February 22, 2008

Very disappointing the so called sex scandal to strike McCain and his lobbyist

A very sorry picture is emerging of a person who has all the right credentials but not the right backbone.

We dont know why his campaign was talking behind his back to the woman and to the NYT but not to the candidate.

this does not bode well for the Presidency, becoz we could get a dithering not in charge guy whose staff runs the show and runs rings around him.

Already his past history is no day at the beach aside from the heroism of his POW and Vietnam war days.

He married this rich second wife in less than exemplary conditions. She stole prescription meds from a drug rehab program and then passed the blame to somebody else, only admitting it months or maybe years later. Typical of a rich, white woman who doesnt feel she has to acknowledge personal failings.

Then the Keating 5 issue.

Now this lobbyist issue, maybe he was taken with the young chick, though she doesnt look like anybody's favorite valentine. Maybe he was taken by the wealth that came along with her. dont forget his second wife was a rich chick.

But why wasnt he in the decision loop. Why were his aides intimidating the chick. It sounds very French Court and Manchurian back scenes manipulation, which is the last thing America needs. Rush Limbaugh should be worried about that rather than just beating Liberals on the head. What does it say about transparency, taking responsibility and being a stand up guy.

And then there is the dithering on the votes.

I'll let Gail Collins tell you: In a Feb 16 op ed in NYT

Getting along with people you loathe is part of the business of politics, and nobody is blaming McCain for buddying up to the man he virtually accused of aiding and abetting Al Qaeda during the Florida primary. Although when you’ve said that somebody’s campaign was “based on a wholesale deception of voters,” calling it a “hard, intensive, fine, honorable” effort is perhaps one adjective too many.It’s not as if McCain has been caving in on anything important, like economic recovery ...(Feb. 6: The Senate votes on a Democratic economic stimulus plan, which would give more help to the unemployed, veterans and senior citizens than the version President Bush wants. Forced to choose between Bush and the unemployed/veterans/elderly, McCain flew back to Washington and — skipped the vote.)Or torture ...(Feb. 13: The Senate considers a bill, vehemently opposed by the White House, which would prohibit C.I.A. interrogators from using tactics like waterboarding on detainees. McCain, whose ringing denunciation of waterboarding was the highlight of the Republican debates, votes — no. He says his own Detainee Treatment Act already bans use of physical force during interrogations. This would be the law that Bush, in one of his famous signing statements, said the president did not have to follow.)

Let's say it does not add up to a good thing.

We are getting a wheeler dealer, who talks a good streak and tries to project dependability, but he is a weasel and a spineless. He also never talks about his Bangladeshi adopted child, like he is ashamed he did it. What's the matter.

This is not a stand up guy. Good for the Senate, but a weasel in the White House.

that's how it looks folks.

Bye bye

No comments: